

M
y child is not autistic, he has
autism...
by Valerie Dejean
Autism
is a developmental disorder. This means it is not a disease
like chicken pox. Nor is a condition like retardation. It
is more akin to a learning disorder. This is why it is
accurate to say that "my child is not autistic, he has autism."
The word "Autistic" implies some sort of condition that you
are stuck with, like brain damage or a missing kidney. Having a
developmental disorder implies that something is missing
or blocking the child from climbing the next rung of the
developmental ladder. This perspective is more hopeful to be sure,
but is it true that autism is a developmental
disorder?
Let us say, for the time being, that a
developmental model is a very useful way to understand the
disorder of autism. Useful in that it points not only to a diagnosis,
but a plan, perhaps even a recovery.
B
ut you have heard doctors on the
television, doctors of the Blood and Bones variety, say
that there is no cure for autism. Our developmental model is
philosophically very different from a medical Blood and Bones
model, not to say that any model, including ours, has a monopoly on
the ultimate truth. Real clinical therapists are what in the world of
business would be called Applications Engineers. Applications
engineers look for a model that works. They try to fix your
lawnmower, or your child right now, leaving it to the
philosophers and researchers to quantify, qualify and otherwise argue
about the ultimate truth, hypothesis or paradigm. That being said, I
assert that the developmental model is consistent with what we
observe, can be tested in the clinic or by some kind of longitudinal
study (which would study a human's development over a considerable
period of time), and, in fact, adds new insights into that ultimate
longitudinal study, the theory of evolution. But let us get back to
the child with autism.
A typically
developing child does not just start speaking in sentences between
his second and third birthday. There have been many steps along
the way. His brain has made hundreds of thousands of
connections between his sensory perceptions and his behaviors and
actions upon the environment. Even if blessed with a normal
nervous system this child must still begin with step one and
cannot skip any steps between step one and step one
hundred.
H
e must "coo" and "aw"
at the world as he lays on his back. As he grows and becomes
strong enough to sit up and hold his head steady and eat food off of
a spoon, he can then smack his lips together to vocalize "ba
ba", "da da" and "ma ma". He must
learn to copy your gesture of raising his arms in the air to indicate
up. He must point with his finger to gain your attention to
either get or identify something in the environment. All
these are pieces of the cognitive foundations for learning to talk.
If these foundations of vocalizing, imitation, joint
attention and praxis are weak then the higher- level skills of
communication will be compromised.
The
Problem:
For example the capacity to imitate is
a basic cognitive foundation for speech. We do not actually
teach our children to imitate; it emerges as predictably as sitting
and walking in a typically developing child. It is almost
universally deficient in children with autism. The child with
autism does not imitate. The same is true for pointing. No one
teaches a typically developing child how to
point; rather, he has the
wherewithal (cognition) to understand that if he can get you to look
at what he is interested in you might tell him what it is or, even
better, get it for him. The child with autism can not do this
A
ssumptions UNDERLYING TREATMENT:
The nervous system is self-correcting or has a natural ability to heal
itself. We assume that the childs behavior is purposeful as an effort
to self correct. In treatment we try and figure out what the child is
trying to accomplish and help him appease his system in a more adaptive
manner.
In treatment we watch what the child is driven by and guided by this we
try to meet the childs need. We assume the child holds the answer if we
listen correctly.
We don't try to extinguish a behavior, rather we respond to the need
and then lead the child to a more adaptive behavior.
Engagement of the child is essential.
The Solution: Vestibular-Auditory
Re-Integration
These innate understandings of the environment do not emerge naturally
in the child with Autism. So what do we do about it? Using
a developmental model we attempt to elicit the capacity
to imitate rather than teach imitation. We elicit pointing
rather than teach it. We do this by improving
the children's body image and capacity to self-organize their movements
toward their chosen outcome. We do this by improving
their balance. We do this by improving their sense of self and
sense of other. This neurological capacity is called praxis and
it is the foundation for all imitative and later original action.
If we can elicit this capacity then a child can go on to naturally
learn from their environment through their day-to-day actions.
This is a radically different approach than trying to teach the
technique of imitation and pointing by moving a child's hand through
the gesture. We call our method Vestibular-Auditory
Re-Integration.
This article is about the 2000 autistic children we have seen at the Spectrum Center in the last 17 years. We identify their problems and show how we assessed them to be autistic using a developmental model based on Sensory Integration. The developmental model is based on the finding that a child progresses through predictably defined phase or steps. So that, for example, he will progress from the 2 yr 0 month stage to the 2 yr 1 month stage with certain predictable traits emerging.
If the child regresses which is almost always the case in autism, then he will go from 2 yr 1 month to 2 yr 0 months in his development. He will backslide, and lose the ability to do things that he has done before.
We have had about 80 percent success in improving if not curing these 2000 autistic children. To understand this method you must shift your thinking, and your paradigm away from the conventional medicine.
Our neighbors at the NIH in Bethesda, Maryland, approach autism from a
blood and bones perspective and believe as a matter of faith that any
cure for autism, or anything (!) will come from a hard medication based
treatment. They can not and will not, as a rule, see an alternate point
of view because they are looking at the world thru a different pair of
glasses. They will ignore whatever other evidence is presented because
it can not fit into their schema, their paradigm, their mission, their
funding.
In this article I will tip-toe on the edges of
philosophy when I tell you about our developmental model. Then I will
show you how this model points to a definite area for
intervention which has, in fact, produced good results for
about two thousand autistic children at the Spectrum Centers in the
last sixteen years.
What's HOT in Autism: The
history of fashion in Medicine.
Long gone are the days
when autism was viewed from solely a psychological perspective: Those
were the days when autism was likened to retardation..
The
pendulum has swung the other way. Now they are looking for the cause
of autism in biology. That is where the funding is, so
naturally that is where most of the research is being done.
This has resulted in many Blood and Bones type interventions.
Blood and Bones type Medical models are very concrete. For
example, one well funded line of research is called the Leaky Gut
Syndrome. They say that a leaky gut results in opiate crossing the
brain-blood barrier and that this has severe neurological
consequences. The intervention is that they fix the leaky
gut or perhaps even look for the cause of the leaky gut such as
mercury toxicity from a vaccination. Very Concrete. Very Tangible.
The treatment for leaky gut does
not, however, address the developmental issues that now
exist.
The child whose had multiple ear infections secondary to a weak
immune system, may no longer have ear infections now that he has
had
bio-medical treatment, but he has missed the critical period
for language emergence. Here the developmental skills
of occupational therapists, speech therapists, play therapists, and
educators as well as the skills of someone schooled in the Tomatis
Method are essential. It is essential to fill in the developmental
gaps.
There is some competition between these two points of
view. Look at it, if you want, as the boys against the girls. The
Blood and Guts type interventions versus the "soft" (read
as "cuddly. fluffy, airy-fairy) interventions. The developmental
model points to the Soft interventions.
Something must be said
of the behavioral models. Although very useful in eliciting
basic skills for children who are severely dyspraxic and benefit from
learning in small repeated snippets of information, the behavioral
models fall short of helping a child to learn innately and
naturally, and to generalize their skills to novel situations.
No one teaches a typically developing child to talk or to play or to
read and interpret the thousand of social cues they face daily.
These are innate intelligences that emerge at developmentally
appropriate times.
So we will argue that although the Blood
and Bones model and the Behavioral models have produced results,
on their own they do not steer the child through the
developmental maze that emerges from this disorder. Nor do they
help the recovery from autism by helping your child to re-integrate
his vestibular-auditory system.
A developmental model is a
bottom up approach to interventio
n. It works on the foundations
such as vocalizing, imitation, joint attention and
praxis; not the outcome skills such as speech and
reading. In sensory-based intervention we assume that those
foundations are of neurological organization. They cannot be
taught; rather they are potentials that can be elicited. This
is Vestibular-Auditory Re-Integration.
A
developmental model presupposes that many of the behavioral and
communicative idiosyncrasies observed in Autism and PDD are
not the causes of the disorder, but rather are symptoms
based upon an underlying developmental disorder. The focus of
the intervention is on the sensory systems
involved in the child's ability to perceive and understand his
environment.
All learning is dependent on this. In
improving this ability, we hope to provide an improved foundation
upon which normal development can take place. There are many
studies indicating how sensory deprivation can result in delayed or
atypical development. It is believed that the central nervous
systems of children with Autism and PDD do not properly perceive,
process and organize sensory information from their bodies and their
environment. Therefore, they are not able to respond
effectively to their environment and thus develop normally.
A
developmental model is critical to understanding changes when a
child with autism is recovering. Waiting for a child
to speak can be agonizing. Unless a parent can be taught to
understand the important developmental markers along the way
it can be a discouraging process. If a child is talking when can we
expect him to tell us how he feels? When will our child be in a
mainstream class? What ever our hopes and dreams are for our
children, knowing the typical stages of development helps.
Knowing how far "on" or "off " the mark
that our child is this week helps us to know what to look for
next week as he moves up the developmental ladder.
A developmental model can also help us understand behaviors that may
trouble us when he starts to get better. For
example, a child who was always compliant now is sassy and
disobedient. This is actually a sure sign that he or she is getting
better. It can be easier to tolerate when
looked at from the developmental perspective. This child, for the
first time in his life, has the language to try and control his
environment.
A developmental model can help us
understand how to react to new behaviors that are challenging and
confusing. Parents of autistic children are often fearful of
placing limits on their child in fear that he may regress again.
It can be helpful to understand that the behavior they are now seeing
is typical of a new developmental stage that requires limits and
structure. This addresses the issue of whether a recovering child
with autism ought to be disciplined. It can now give parents a sense
of control because they can now use normal parenting standards to
raise their child.
As a developmental disorder, Autism
impacts on so many of the abilities that are unique to us a
human beings. By unique I mean skills that are highly advanced in our
species, such as language, culture, arts, technology and many others,
that do not exist to such an extent in any other living form on this
planet. Because it impacts on so many things, it is often referred to
as a Pervasive Developmental Disorder. Autism can impact our
physical development. It creates Sensory and motor
disturbances. Fine motor and visual motor skills are often delayed.
It can impact negatively on our communications skills with both
receptive and expressive language skills often delayed or unusual in
their style. It can impact social interactions, with social
isolation and difficulty understanding social cues often the
case.
The ability to play creatively, or imaginatively can be severely
curtailed and development of independent and self-sufficient
activities is also effected. What can we do about it? Our
developmental approach aims at addressing and correcting
the nervous system's ability to learn innately and
naturally. If this can be achieved then the child can go on to
learn, as he was intended to.
I suppose that it is hard for a
Blood and Bones, Blood and Guts type person to fathom that by
rolling around on an OT ball, or by swinging back and forth upside
down or that by (eee-gads!) putting on a set of headphones and
listening to Mozart we can correct the problems of the vestibular
system, and ultimately, of autism. But to my concrete friend, I
say: Think of it this way. There used to be a second baseman
whose name was Roberto Alomar. He could dive for a ground ball,
roll over once or twice and fire the baseball to first base, without
even looking. We would say that he had a highly integrated vestibular
system. Michael Jordan did the same thing with a basketball. This
obviously has something to do with Balance. Now, balance is a soft
thing. So is timing. You can't weigh it and you can't photograph it,
but if you have it, you can make a million dollars a year
throwing a ball around. (Now do I have your attention?) Most of what
we value in an exceptional human being is the soft stuff. Most
of what we value in ourselves is the soft stuff.
With
Vestibular-Auditory Re-Integration, we correct the nervous system's
ability to learn. By using the Tomatis Method, we work directly on
the ear. The ear, if you remember from eighth grade science, controls
actually two things. It does the hearing for us, and it controls the
balance. Alfred A. Tomatis spent about fifty years figuring out how
by working on the listening function of the ear, he could also
correct the nervous system's balance function. That is how what we do
works, and why it works. (Our website has about a hundred pages on
this subject.)
Parents
are pragmatic. They are more motivated. The downside of being more
motivated is that they are more gullible. To both quackery and to
authoritarian proclamations from the National Institute of Health. That
being said, we assert that our methods have stood the test of time, and
that three quarter of those autistic children came to us by way of
referral.
A Paradigm shift
What makes us different from conventional medicine is that they treat
the body, with drugs, radiation etc, directly (that's hard science as
in hardware) where we treat the senses (this is soft science as in
software).
Hard science usually gets more funding than soft science. Soft science can be very "airey-fairey" indeed and will not get much credence from government, congressmen, generals or medical experts who are regularly seen on TV as saying, and I quote,
"There is absolutely NO proof that (fill in the blank) is related to (), or is caused by, or can be cured by ().
< font size="-0">This is true, looking at the world from their reductionist perspective. Reduce everything to blood and bone s, and you will never explain the psyche, or human society or any human traits at all, except perhaps locomotion.
I suggest that we treat the body as a system, (not a new idea), and further that we look at a system of senses (this is getting more novel) in order to understand muscle tone, cognition, autism... This is what Jean Ayers did, and Alfred Tomatis.
It takes a village (to borrow a phrase) to
treat an autistic child. Right now the village is dysfunctional.
Our Village seems to be competing over precious resources when, at
the same time there is an epidemic of Autism. Research is essential
yet the therapists in the field are far away from the academic
institutions that jealously guard their funding. Development,
being a somewhat abstract concept, is much harder to understand
than Blood and Bones. It is not cut and dry and it is often
unpredictable. The Developmental professions are frequently dominated
by women. We talk about neurological soft signs and the study of
development is a soft science. It is much harder to validate
for this reason. It does not pay as much.
However, all
of this politics ultimately has no bearing on whether the soft
science of Vestibular Re-Integration does or does not work.
It works! At the Spectrum Center 90% of our clients see changes that
they deem significant in their children.
We
stand on the shoulders of giants (a personal note by Valerie
Dejean)
Dr. Alfred A. Tomatis and Dr. A. Jean Ayers
devoted their lives to the study of human development. In the
creation of original interventions for remediation of these
developmental disorders, they have laid the foundation, theoretical
and clinical, for a cure for autism. I thank providence every day for
their genius and for all the children and adults that they have
helped with their thinking. The purpose of this article and others is
to discuss their theories and research, particularly as it pertains
to autism. I hope parents will see their children on
these pages and gain understanding. Mostly I hope these writings will
give hope, because in working with autistic children for 30
years I know first hand that there is tremendous reason for hope.
I know that in every sound-bite on autism that I have ever
seen on television, there has been some expert, usually with a
stethoscope hanging around his neck, who will say that "there is
no cure for autism". However I have personally seen
miracles more often than I would have ever thought possible. Mostly I
am struck by the small miracles, the small steps of human
development that add up into the big miracles, and by the courage
and tenacity of the families who walk down the road of recovery from
autism.


